Wednesday, July 31, 2013

Tangled Up In Blue


http://knittinandkittens.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/tangled-skein.jpg"This Dependent Origination is profound", quotes Sayadaw from the Bhvacakra Sutra, and 'this generation...' through NOT understanding, and NOT penetrating, has become a tangled skein.

Also, he discusses purification by overcoming doubt, which (from the Visuddhimagga) is seeing mentality/materiality as being due to conditions in past, present and future, and then you can overcome doubt about the three dimensions of time.   I love that part, the notion that we have built up a very complex delusion about these dimensions, and not,

I suppose that there simply are 'no' dimensions or one dimension, just that we have our perspectives tightly held, tangled there. 




(all from Page Thirty-One)

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

The Long Train


http://www.nationalpost.com/4353467.bin?size=620x465

A theme with Sayadaw is how good concentration strengthens insight. This makes such sense. Even if we cannot see the results of our practice immediately, we know from experience that poor concentration, wavering here and there, following the habit of the mind to expand, yields poor results. As for open awareness, not concentrating on a single point, that too can be good concentration or wandering and wavering.  The still point in 'choiceless awareness' is inside, back to awareness itself. 

Sayadaw offers that with good concentration, we can see the chain of dependent causation back into past lives and forward into future lives. He tells the story of Mahadhana who squandered his life, illustrating how our future is determined all the time by our present.
This is Karma, the long train.

Monday, July 29, 2013

Page TWENTY NINE

"Dwelling in the goal of asceticism". . . Sayadaw's words are carefully chosen.  Asceticism toward fetters, living in strict observation of what one is picking up, and if it gives nutrition to ignorance, pride or envy, to set it back down.  Staying in concentration to see the "origin and cessation" of the aggregates.  To see the aggregates as they are.

Sunday, July 28, 2013

Pack Lightly

on PAGE TWENTY EIGHT Sayadaw points out that even the Buddha suffered from the possession of the five aggregates (he had back pain, for one thing).  He quotes from the Samanabrhamana Sutra, a twist on the Four Noble Truths by the Buddha on the end of formation:

Bhikkus, those ascetics or Brahmins who do not understand aging and death, who do not understand aging and death's origin, who do not understand aging and death's cessation, the way leading to aging and death's cessatioin, who do not understand the (12 links of causation), these I do not consider ascetics among ascetics..... etc.

I recall pictures of yogis on the wall of the recreated Dalai Lamas' training room at the Rubin Museum.  Just regular guys, more important than any specially hatted lama.

http://mylifemystuff.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/tibetan-yoga.jpg



Saturday, July 27, 2013

Distant Stars

http://www.cosmotography.com/images/small_gabany_ngc891_2010.jpgon PAGE TWENTY SEVEN, we are reminded that the Second Noble Truth is an insight which then requires application of the Third Noble Truth which Sayadaw puts in terms of the cessation of the links in dependent origination.  Also, seeing those links, and 'the momentary cessation of formations.'  I consider insight, the antidote to ignorance.  I place ignorance in this plane, this narrative, this story.  I worry that there is nothing more. I suggest to myself that enlightenment must be only a thought, and not transformative.  I see so little of value that proceeds from the mind. I wonder what qualities mentality and materiality might have in common, or the link that they have.  It's just my partiality to things that seem more permanent, even the quick sunset seems to promise many years of sunset.  It is just a little more steady and longlasting than my mind.

Seeing the way things work begins to strip the cloak off of reality. 

What is out there beyond the mind?  Wait, beyond what?

Friday, July 26, 2013

TWENTY SIX

Sayadaw divides the wheel of dependent origination into five causes (ignorance, volitional formations, craving, clinging and existence) which lead to five results of rebirth (consciousness, mentality-materiality, the sense bases, contact and feeling).  That's cool.  I had not seen it that way before.  The 'results' are the aggregates.  I just had the weird sensation that none of these ten are actions, they are all dependent things that create an illusion of action. 
The wheel turns as if by spell, 
the sea rolls out again.  
The day takes on the cloak of night, 
when her gathering is done.

Thursday, July 25, 2013

Slow Boat

http://images.angusrobertson.com.au/images/ar/MI000172/MI0001724290/0/0/plain/slow-boat.jpgon PAGE TWENTY FIVE, Sayadaw lists the Three Purifications, which are of morality, of consciousness, and of view.  Morality, he says begins with the monastic code, and consciousness with the Jhanas, and view (analytical knowledge of body and mind) - the correct seeing of mentality-materiality.

Following that, he discusses the importance of knowing the origin of suffering (the second noble truth) as craving for sense pleasures, existence/non-existence and dependent origination.

I get sort of terrified of the code of morality because getting close to it would mean major life changes, possibly leading to becoming a monk.  Imagine I really let go of my distractions. I should ask if I like this slow boat. 

Wednesday, July 24, 2013

Having it Your Way

Who would have guessed that to see things as they are is exalted.  When does this little trick of the tail become part of our outlook that this now, this body and this consciousness (es) is less than exalted. Always we want to be somewhere else.  So this is both process and content, as on page TWENTY FOUR are the rest of the sixteen types of consciousness. In other words, we are looking at types, which category one's arising consciousness falls into, but I would speculate that the categorization helps with process, noting the types, I can see what exactly is arising and therefore the arising, the sustaining and the passing away, one of the ultimate processes inherent in samsara


Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Looking at it All

page TWENTY THREE, Sayadaw discusses how important the understanding of various types of consciousnesses can be, and lists them, from the Satipattana Sutta, those associated with and without lust and hatred, delusion, those that are tired and agitated.  On the psychiatric unit in therapy group, we start with sharing about the body, and then emotions and share the connections.

It all sheds light on the subject, which is a challenge worth taking; some of it is practice, some of it is support, some of it is effort, and some of it is letting go.   I paste an article I wrote today for the paper:

Faith’s Bright Light

I work on a psychiatric unit in New Jersey, primarily with lower-income patients of various backgrounds. We use a ‘Wellness Recovery Action Plan’; a binder that each patient can take home that helps people with bipolar disorder, depression and other mental health problems to learn new coping skills. The Spirituality section is quite short; it only asks “How do you define spirituality for yourself?” and “List some action steps:”

In our morning Goals group, one young lady recently smiled as she stated she began church again after a long absence.  Another said to her “Yes, all you have to do is get back in the door and leave the devil behind.” From across the table someone else offered “Oh but the devil is inside the building too.” 

These are challenging conversations for a social worker, not only in finding a way for everyone to express a personal matter, but in working with my own feelings as well.  Mostly I try to learn from others and keep my beliefs out of it, but I am comfortable sharing some generalities. 

A few ‘truisms’ I have discovered are that most people have some sort of spiritual view and get something positive when they practice it; most people at one time or another have difficulty practicing it; and returning to spiritual practice is even more difficult when there are blocks to self-acceptance. 

Sometimes when introducing the topic I ask if spiritual practice is challenging because it ‘shines a light’ on every part of us.  Most people agree, and this question can lead to a discussion about acceptance.  Why is it, when our faith practices offer unconditional acceptance (I could offer quotes from every faith here) that we have difficulty ‘walking back through the door’ to pray, meditate, or listen?

Mark Twain once said “But who prays for Satan,. . he being among sinners the supremest?” That may be the crux of our struggle with spirituality, the acceptance of the way we are, the way things are.  And self-acceptance is not resignation; it’s a way to truly begin knowing and seeing what we are so that we can grow.  I sometimes hold up a crumpled piece of paper and suggest, “If we want to become well, let’s say like a smooth sheet of paper, how to do it?”  The answer of course is to work with the folds and crinkles that we are made of now.

Rumi writes: “This being human is a guest house. Every morning a new arrival. A joy, a depression, a meanness, some momentary awareness comes as an unexpected visitor. Welcome and entertain them all! Even if they're a crowd of sorrows, who violently sweep your house empty of its furniture, still, treat each guest honorably. He may be clearing you out for some new delight.”

Sometimes work on the unit is like Rumi’s guest house, crowded with unrestrained emotion. Group therapy is the most difficult group for me; it's just a big circle where we share feelings. Part of my work is ‘getting out of the way’, allowing for the expression of pain without over-managing it, and part of it is allowing my own ‘guest house’ to be visited and cleared out. Today I let the group wait in silence while a member danced around her true feelings.  I felt everyone’s discomfort and desire to move on.  And then she told us that today was the anniversary of a family suicide she discovered.

Now the group and I had some serious pain on the table in front of us.  The speaker offered a number of practical ways for dealing with the anniversary. I remembered another quote from Rumi, “Keep looking at the bandaged place, that’s where the light enters you.”  I waited with my own discomfort and looking at her moist eyes asked her to express her feelings. Waves of tears and anger followed.  This particular group is encouraged NOT to run in with tissues and hugs, and they didn't. They waited, practicing patience and acceptance of their own feelings.  In the end, she was able to take the support of the group home with her to visit the graveside.

I sat in meditation all day Saturday at the Makefield Meeting house with our Buddhist group. It was terribly hot, and my knees hurt.  My mind was like a bad movie. But we sit all day for the same reason we don’t rush in with tissues at the first teardrop, for the same reason we don’t lock the door on a grumpy friend. At the end of the day we showed the same respect for our insights, our sorrows and our joys, we shared them and did not force them to stay or go before their time, because they are visitors also.

Faith 'shines a light' on every part of us, light and dark - our generosity and kindness, selfishness and jealousy, anger and joy. It is a challenge to take in all states as equally and fully human, find some thread of compassion in our own fathom-long body for our own bursting heart and even for the devil beside us. It's a journey with unexpected twists and turns.

On the ride home, I was wishing for my sunglasses, it was so bright outside. But truth be told, it was bright inside, too.

Monday, July 22, 2013

Stream Winners

http://www.liberty.edu/templates/clubsports/images/news_main/lr12_079.jpgOn PAGE TWENTY-TWO, Sayadaw kinda repeats page 12, and mentions 89 types of consciousness and 52 types of associated mental factors, the objects of insight meditation being 81 of those types, and the result the remaining 8 'supramundane consciousnesses.' 

Here is a taste of those from 'The Abhidhamma in Practice'  (which by the way is a quick summary of the same material in Sayadaw's book) at Access to Insight:


Lokuttara cittas

The word lokuttara is derived from loka and uttara. In this context loka refers to the five aggregates; uttara means beyond. Thus lokuttara applies to those states of consciousness that transcend the world of mind and body, i.e., they are supra-mundane.
These states of supra-mundane consciousness are possessed by those who have developed insight into the three aspects of existence — impermanence, unsatisfactoriness, and no-self. As a result of this insight, such a person passes beyond the level of a worldling (puthujjana) and becomes a Noble One (ariya puggala). With this transformation there is a radical change in the person's life and nature because a determinate number of defilements are totally eradicated, never to arise again. These defilements go to form the ten fetters (sa.myojanaa) that bind a person down to the wheel of existence. They are eradicated in stages as one becomes, in succession, a stream-winner (sotaapanna), once-returner (sakadaagaamii), non-returner (anaagaami) and arahant.

Sunday, July 21, 2013

Natural Association of Associated Workings


http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6959643-0-large.jpg

More on the 'natural law of consciousness' on PAGE TWENTY-ONE.   When some material object strikes a material door, it at the same time strikes the mind door, which leads to many cognitive processes.  Sayadaw says that each process comprises consciousness moments, and each moment is comprised of the time it takes to arise, stand and pass away.  

They appear to be a compact group, but are not, 'a' consciousness and its many mental factors arise together and just look like an association.


Saturday, July 20, 2013

Excellent Birds


http://www.moma.org/collection_images/resized/035/w500h420/CRI_109035.jpgI sat on retreat today and I was struck by one of the precepts we recited: ". . . to not take what is not freely given."  The retreat leader (Jeanne ♥) pointed out that the precepts also apply to how we relate to ourselves.  I listened to the birds on my walk outside in the steamy heat.  They are the freely given voice of nature, but I take something not given, that they are pretty, or annoying, or just this or that species.  No problem really, but I take more.  Underneath, I take them to myself, to the future or the past, to somewhere far away, turn them into something that is not present at all. That is not my right, and luckily, not my responsibility.  Ease may be a greater part of my own nature they are pointing to.  Why do I take so much of myself away?




on PAGE TWENTY, Sayadaw again notes that if we know materiality well, we can move on to mentality.  He adds more about noting the sense bases and doors (sometimes the same word in other commentaries).  I found a reference I liked in a Vipassana guide on Buddhanet:


the Buddha said. When you see, say, a very beautiful rose you realise the rose is very beautiful. Its scent is very sweet. When you judge like that there arises a pleasant feeling about the rose. When you feel a pleasant feeling what will arise? Attachment, to what? To the rose. To the feeling or to the rose? To the rose. And pleasant feeling, attachment, arises dependent on that feeling. This attachment is to the rose. Then if the flower is not beautiful, is ugly and produces a bad smell, when you see it how do you feel, pleasant or unpleasant? Unpleasant. You'll judge the flower is very ugly, `I don't want to see it.` Then what mental state arises? Aversion. Anger.

This all happens due to a 'natural law of consciousness', a cognitive process of the sense doors. (vithi).  How does that work?  From a commentary on the Abhidhamma


4. Thought-processes

According to Abhidhamma ordinarily there is no moment when we do not experience a particular kind of consciousness, hanging on to some object - whether physical of mental. The time-limit of such a consciousness is termed one thought-moment. The rapidity of the succession of such thought-moments is hardly conceivable by the ken of human knowledge. Books state that within the brief duration of a flash of lightning, or in the twinkling of an eye billions of thought-moments may arise and perish.

Each thought-moment consists of three minor instants (khanas). They are uppada (arising or genesis), thiti (static or development), and bhanga (cessation or dissolution).

Birth, decay, and death* correspond to these three states. The interval between birth and death is regarded as decay.

Immediately after the cessation stage of a thought-moment there results the genesis stage of the subsequent thought-moment. Thus each unit of consciousness perishes conditioning another, transmitting at the same time all its potentialities to its successor. There is, therefore, a continuous flow of consciousness like a stream without any interruption.


[*These three stages correspond to the Hindu view of Brahma (Creator). Vishnu (Preserver) and Siva (Destroyer).]

When a material object is presented to the mind through one of the five sense-doors, a thought-process occurs, consisting of a series of separate thought-moments leading one to the other in a particular, uniform order. This order is known as the citta-niyama (psychic order). As a rule for a complete perception of a physical object through one of the sense-doors precisely 17 thought-moments must pass. As such the time duration of matter is fixed at 17 thought-moments. After the expiration of that time-limit, one fundamental unit of matter perishes giving birth to another unit. The first moment is regarded as the genesis (uppada), the last as dissolution (bhanga), and the interval 15 moments as decay or development (thiti or jara).

As a rule when an object enters the consciousness through any of the doors one moment of the life-continuum elapses. This is known as atita-bhavanga. Then the corresponding thought-process runs uninterruptedly for 16 thought-moments. The object thus presented is regarded as 'very great.'

If the thought-process ceases at the expiration of javanas without giving rise to two retentive moments (tadalambana), thus completing only 14 moments, then the object is called 'great'.

Sometimes the thought-process ceases at the moment of determining (votthapana) without giving rise to the javanas, completing only 7 thought-moments Then the object is termed 'slight.'

At times when an object enters the consciousness there is merely a vibration of the life-continuum. Then the object is termed 'very slight.'

When a so-called 'very great' or 'great' object perceived through the five sense-doors, is subsequently conceived by the mind-door, or when a thought process arising through the mind-door extends up to the retentive stage, then the object is regarded as 'clear'.

When a thought process, arising through the mind-door, ceases at the javana stage, the object is termed 'obscure'.

When, for instance, a person looks at the radiant moon on a cloudless night, he gets a faint glimpse of the surrounding stars as well. He focuses his attention on the moon, but he cannot avoid the sight of stars around. The moon is regarded as a great object, while the stars are regarded as minor objects. Both moon and stars are perceived by the mind at different moments. According to Abhidhamma it is not correct to say that the stars are perceived by the sub-consciousness and the moon by the consciousness. 

WHOA!

Friday, July 19, 2013

and Water


http://userserve-ak.last.fm/serve/_/24989831/Earth+Wind++Fire++The+Emotions+earthwindfireexperienceliveind.jpgAt the bottom of page eighteen and continuing onto PAGE NINETEEN, it's four-element meditation of earth, wind, fire and water.  It's recommended here to focus in the elements within the body due to its closeness to the person practicing.  Sayadaw asserts that following increased awareness of the elements of the body, one must discern also past, future, present, external, gross, subtle, inferior, superior, far and near.  They appear to be relational and from the Khanda Sutta:

"Whatever form is past, future, or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or sublime; far or near: That is called the form aggregate.

"Whatever feeling is past, future, or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or sublime; far or near: That is called the feeling aggregate.
"Whatever perception is past, future, or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or sublime; far or near: That is called the perception aggregate.
"Whatever (mental) fabrications are past, future, or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or sublime; far or near: Those are called the fabrications aggregate.
"Whatever consciousness is past, future, or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or sublime; far or near: That is called the consciousness aggregate.

Scanning ahead, there are many more beginning pages before Sayadaw describes meditation upon these elements.  I don't know how perception or felling can be 'far' or even really 'external'.  But I'll wait here and observe and see what coheres, or falls away. 

Thursday, July 18, 2013

Andele


http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lhx7delOcD1qhpzp8o1_500.jpgDiscernment of materiality is up next (again, kinda) on PAGE EIGHTEEN.  And a big throwdown.  Sayadaw says ". . . although materiality changes billions of times per second, it does not change as quickly as mentality does."  And so "Once you have completed the profound discernment of materiality, the more profound discernment of mentality becomes easier for you to do."    OK so I am at about one change per second, so I only need to go a billion times faster and I'll be ready for mentality.  Something tells me I'll have to slow down to catch up.

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Recollecting


http://www.jogegarts.com/wp-content/uploads/product_manjushri.jpgthe end of page sixteen and PAGE SEVENTEEN is where Sayadaw adds to the concentration and arising of light with the protection of concentration through the four Bramaviharas of Metta (lovingkindness), Karuna (compassion), Mudita (appreciative joy) and Upekkha (equanimity).  It is interesting, how they may be protective of meditation, but they make much sense.  Metta to overcome hatred, Karuna to overcome ill-will, Mudita to overcome envy, and Upekkha to overcome indifference.   I'm especially taken with equanimity, which I sometimes confuse with indifference.  On the one hand, a little bit of seeing everything without pulling might take some turning away, some reduction in looking for details that match our agenda.  That can lead to a profound flattening.  Bikkhu Bodhi writes;


“The real meaning of upekkha is equanimity, not indifference in the sense of unconcern for others. As a spiritual virtue, upekkha means stability in the face of the fluctuations of worldly fortune. It is evenness of mind, unshakeable freedom of mind, a state of inner equipoise that cannot be upset by gain and loss, honor and dishonor, praise and blame, pleasure and pain. Upekkha is freedom from all points of self-reference; it is indifference only to the demands of the ego-self with its craving for pleasure and position, not to the well-being of one's fellow human beings. True equanimity is the pinnacle of the four social attitudes that the Buddhist texts call the 'divine abodes': boundless loving-kindness, compassion, altruistic joy, and equanimity. The last does not override and negate the preceding three, but perfects and consummates them.”[1]


Sayadaw then adds three additional protective factors of

  •     Recollection of the Buddha to protect against fear,
  •     Foulness meditation to protect against lust, 
  •     Recollection of death to protect against laziness and give urgency 

    I remember death.  It was a time when the music became very, very quiet.  


Tuesday, July 16, 2013

It's Inside

PAGE SIXTEEN takes illumination further by noting that it is associated with wisdom that helps us to see things as they really are. Additional information is footnoted to page 138, which I won't go to right now.  Instead, I'll look around.  From Access to Insight again:


If all that, too, does not help, then he may recall the inner light of which many mystics speak and which arises in the meditations of a purified mind that has turned away from the world. Then, in his practice, he will be unconcerned about day or night, because an inner light is shining within him. Then, with his self-radiant mind, he will be able to leave behind, like a Brahma-deity, the whole realm of days and nights as perceived by the senses. This indicated that Moggallana had experienced such states before, so that the Buddha could refer to them as something known to Moggallana. This "Perception of (inner) Light" (aloka-sañña) is mentioned in the 33rd Discourse of the Digha Nikaya, as one of four ways of developing samadhi and as leading to "Knowledge and Vision" (ñanadassana).


and from one of Ajahn Lee's teachings:

  1. Investigate the in-and-out breath. When the breath comes in long, be aware of the fact. When it goes out long, be aware of it. When you first begin dealing with the breath, start out by sending your attention out with the out-breath and in with the in-breath. Do this two or three times, and then let your attention settle in the middle — without letting it follow the breath in or out — until the mind becomes still, paying attention only to the in-and-out breath. Make the mind open, relaxed and at ease. You can settle your awareness at the tip of the nose, at the palate — if you can keep it centered in the middle of the chest, so much the better. Keep the mind still, and it will feel at ease. Discernment will arise; an inner light will appear, reducing distractive thought.
    I have been meditating for a long time and have seen clarity and a light but it has been more metaphorical.

Monday, July 15, 2013

Let There Be


http://xignite-cdn.s3.amazonaws.com/blog/10_20_11/LetThereBeLight.jpgand on PAGE FIFTEEN, there was light. What kind of light? Well, of the sun, moon, fire and wisdom.  From the Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta: "Vision arose, insight arose, discernment arose, knowledge arose, illumination arose within me. . ."  Rather than simply being a product of enlightenment, Sayadaw turns it around and says that this light allows us to penetrate to ultimate reality. It sounds like an actual illumination rather than simply a metaphorical one although it might be both.

Sunday, July 14, 2013

All Access

Sayadaw takes a left turn on PAGE FOURTEEN and says that to see the types of materiality, one must be able to have 'strong and powerful concentration'.  He introduces the following types: 



  • Concentration of the Jhanas, using for example mindfulness of breathing and the ten kasinas, or
  • Access concentration using four-elements meditations. 
Jhanas are successive states of deeper and deeper absorption in meditation and 'Access concentration is,  well, a piece from Access to Insight offers some information, stating that there are eight steps to concentration, which are:

http://thumbs1.ebaystatic.com/d/l225/m/mZtOA50M4s2y8JqGnhV1mGA.jpgThe eight steps are named: counting (ganana); following (anubandhana); contact (phusana); fixing (thapana); observing (sallakkhana); turning away (vivattana), purification (parisuddhi); and retrospection (patipassana). These eight cover the whole course of meditative development up to the attainment of arahantship.

I'll stick with where I've felt myself to be, which is counting, following the breathing and then some of contact and 'fixing', although these terms are brand new to me:

(iii) Contact and (iv) Fixing

These two aspects of the practice indicate the development of stronger concentration. When the mindfulness of breathing is maintained, the breathing becomes more and more subtle and tranquil. As a result the body becomes calm and ceases to feel fatigued. Bodily pain and numbness disappear, and the body begins to feel an exhilarating comfort, as if it were being fanned with a cool gentle breeze.
At that time, because of the tranquillity of the mind, the breathing becomes finer and finer until it seems that it has ceased. At times this condition lasts for many minutes. This is when breathing ceases to be felt. At this time some be come alarmed thinking the breathing has ceased, but it is not so. The breathing exists but in a very delicate and subtle form. No matter how subtle the breathing becomes, one must still keep mindful of the contact (phusana) of the breath in the area of the nostrils, without losing track of it. The mind then becomes free from the five hindrances — sensual desire, anger, drowsiness, restlessness and doubt. As a result one becomes calm and joyful.
It is at this stage that the "signs" or mental images appear heralding the success of concentration. First comes the learning sign (uggaha-nimitta), then the counterpart sign (patibhaga-nimitta). To some the sign appears like a wad of cotton, like an electric light, a sliver chain, a mist or a wheel. It appeared to the Buddha like the clear and bright midday sun.
The learning sign is unsteady, it moves here and there, up and down. But the counterpart sign appearing at the end of the nostrils is steady, fixed and motionless. At this time there are no hindrances, the mind is most active and extremely tranquil. This stage is expounded by the Buddha when he states that one breathes in tranquilizing the activity of the body, one breathes out tranquilizing the activity of the body.
The arising of the counterpart sign and the suppression of the five hindrances marks the attainment of access concentration (upacara-samadhi). As concentration is further developed, the meditator attains full absorption (appana-samadhi) beginning with the first jhana. Four stages of absorption can be attained by the practice of anapana sati, namely, the first, second, third and fourth jhanas. These stages of deep concentration are called "fixing" (thapana).

Well, to be honest, no real counterpart sign but some weird and wonderful things have occurred temporarily.  I love this stuff.  It is quite the paradoxical effort to stay with concentration.





Saturday, July 13, 2013

Ingredients

on PAGE THIRTEEN, Sayadaw concludes the introductory section on materiality-mentality with the Buddha's explanation of 'what is materiality' from the Mahagopataka Sutta, that it is composed of 'The four great elements', namely: Earth, water, fire and wind.  Furthermore, there are 24 types of 'derived materiality', (these from the Abhidahamma) namely:


    Physical sense-organs of: seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting, body

    Physical sense-objects: form, sound, odour, taste, bodily impacts

    'Bodily impacts' photthabba are generally omitted in this list, because these physical objects of body-sensitivity are identical with the afore-mentioned solid element, heat and motion element. Hence their inclusion under 'derived materiality' would be a duplication.

        femininity itthindriya
        virility purisindriya
        physical base of mind hadaya-vatthu
        bodily expression kāya-viññatti s. viññatti
        verbal expression vacī-viññatti
        physical life rūpa jīvita s. jīvita
        space element ākāsa-dhātu
        physical agility rūpassa lahutā
        physical elasticity rūpassa mudutā
        physical adaptability rūpassa kammaññatā
        physical growth rūpassa upacaya
        physical continuity rūpassa santati s.
        decay jarā
        impermanence aniccatā
        nutriment āhāra

http://www.totalbodyhs.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/ingredients-list-227x300.jpgIt's like unbaking a cake. We've been eating and baking things, the ingredients of which were, until now, unknown.

Friday, July 12, 2013

Really, it's UNcondensed


http://52scoops.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/condensed-milk.jpg

on PAGE TWELVE, Sayadaw discusses the aforementioned 52 mental factors (all the factors of mentality from perception to feeling to energy, greed, rapture, etc.) and adds 89 types of consciousness.  Here is a chart: Citta and bases  Some of them are from the sense bases, and some are wholesome (such as those rooted in greed, hatred and delusion) and some are wholesome. He says that when one consciousness arises, so arise a 'number' of mental factors. He stresses the importance of knowing all these mental factors but also knowing the materiality upon which they are dependent.

To do that we must see the 'sub-atomic particles' that make up mentality called Rupa-kalapas.  And yet are they particles?  No, they are made of individual elements, precursors to the 'illusion of compactness.'



Thursday, July 11, 2013

Pete Tredish

on PAGE ELEVEN, Sayadaw explains that we must know mentality-materiality not as a concept but as reality.  We must penetrate to ultimate reality.  Coincidentally, I was thinking about that today.

I'm surprised at this book.  I'm surprised at all the things on Access to Insight I didn't read long ago that are incredibly odd.

I was at work today, just doing this and that and was noticing the appearance of things, in rapid succession, coming into relationship with my eye.  They became profoundly neutral, without names, and yet still vibrant. There is nothing weirder than the way things are, to the mind that has fully labeled things, when that mind is rent by insight. 

http://scienceroll.files.wordpress.com/2007/12/petri-dish-1.jpgAlso, it is then like a petri dish if one is not careful, because of the rich medium that incarnation brings.  I don't yet know why we are protected as babies, and I suppose only some of us are, from so many opportunistic infections of the mind.

Babies, the cultivation of memory, the train cars of age whizzing by, and the here and now.  The keys to insight someone left on the table, under a pile of letters.

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

Funhouse


http://howstuffworks.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/funhouse-mirror.jpg

Sayadaw says on PAGE TEN, 'When you have developed strong concentration, you will be able to see that the object is reflected in the mind-door as in a mirror.'
It makes a lot of sense, this consciousness being made of reflection. He says that at first, this reflection is very weak, and then after a series of mind-consciousnesses, the image/idea becomes stronger.

He says that the first sense and mind consciousnesses that arise are weak and do not 'know' the sense object, that comes later. 

We may, I guess, take up this reflection as 'mine', but not always. When it comes to compassion or seeing things as they are, that is not the case. It is a great challenge to be mindful, to deepen awareness without at the same time, deepening ownership.

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Peephole

on PAGE NINE
Sayadaw mentions that when an object strikes a sense-door it at the same time strikes the mind-door.  In another case, mind objects can also strike the mind-door.  Mind objects can include the 52 mental factors

-->
(a) the Seven Common Properties (sabbacitta), so called on account of being common to all classes of consciousness, viz.:

1. phassa (contact)
2. vedanā (feeling)
3. saññā (perception)
4. cetanā (volition)
5. ekaggatā (concentration of mind)
6. jīvita (psychic life)
7. manasikāra (attention).

(b) The six Particulars (pakinnakā), so called because they invariably enter into composition with consciousness, viz.:

1. vitakka (initial application)
2. vicāra (sustained application)
3. viriya (effort)
4. pīti (pleasurable interest)
5. chanda (desire-to-do)
6. adhimokka (deciding).

The above thirteen kinds (a) and (b) are called Mixtures (vimissaka), or better, as rendered by Shwe Zan Aung "Un-morals", as they are common to both moral and immoral consciousness in composition.

(c) the fourteen Immorals (papajāti), viz.:

l. lobha (greed)
2. dosa (hate)
3. moha (dullness)
4. ditthi (error)
5. māna (conceit)
6. issā (envy)
7. macchariya (selfishness)
8. kukkucca (worry)
9. ahirika (shamelessness)
10. anottappa (recklessness)
11. uddhacca (distraction)
12. thīna (sloth)
13. middha (torpor)
14. vicikicchā (scepticism)

(d) The twenty-five Morals (kalayanajatika) viz.:
1. alobha (generous)
2. adosa (amity)
3. amoha (reason)
4. saddhā (faith)
5. sati (mindfulness)
6. hiri (modesty)
7. ottappa (discretion)
8. tatramajjihattatā (balance of mind)
9. kāya-passaddhi (composure of mental properties)
10. citta-passaddhi (composure of mind)
11. kāya-lahutā (buoyancy of mental properties)
12. citta-lahutā (buoyancy of mind)
13. kāya-mudutā (pliancy of mental properties)
14. citta-mudutā (pliancy of mind)
15. kāya-kammaññatā (adaptability of mental properties)
16. citta-kammaññatā (adaptability of mind)
17. kāya-pāguññatā (proficiency of mental properties)
18. citta-pāguññatā (proficiency of mind)
19. kāya’ujukatā (rectitude of mental properties)
20. citta’ujukatā (rectitude of mind)

The following three are called the Three Abstinences (viratiyo) 
21. sammāvācā (right speech)
22. sammākammanto (right action)
23. samma-ājīvo (right livelihood)

The last two are called the two Illimitables or appamaññā.
24. karunā (pity)
25. muditā (appreciation)

and now a sidebar back to the point that consciousness arises with every contact between a door and a thing. How does it work?  Is it like a thermos, that simply knows to keep hot soup hot and cold drink cold?  I think Sayadaw is gonna get into it.  There is reference in various places that consciousness is extremely hard to observe as vs. feeling tones (the sequalae to contact) but also to note that consciousness has a very different cast to it than say, an object or a sense door alone. It could be said that they are the dead part brought to life by consciousness, but that would be haughty.  Also, what's the difference between the eye-consciousness and mind-consciousness?

I'll keep a watch out for more information on that.  What I get so far is Vijnana http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vij%C3%B1%C4%81na   kind of redundant....

Monday, July 8, 2013

Knock-Knock



http://www.saltyseattle.com/wp-content/uploads/steppenwolf-530x530.jpg

To see mentality-materiality, says Sayadaw, we must know and see the sense doors, the objects that strike them, and the consciousness that arises thereby.  On PAGE EIGHT, he notes that the Buddha divides them into five materiality doors (eye, ear, nose, tongue, body) and one mentality door, the mind-door.  BUT, while the five material doors depend on their respective material sense, the sixth 'mental' sense door depends on 'the materiality that is the heart-base'.  Wait, what?   From a commentary on the Abhidharma:

The heart or mind-base element (hadaya vatthu): in the Buddha's time the view was held that the heart forms the seat of consciousness. The Buddha never accepted or rejected this theory. He referred to the basis of consciousness indirectly as: ya.m ruupa.m nissaaya — "that material thing depending on which mind-element and mind-consciousness-element arise." Since mind and matter are inter-dependent, it is reasonable to conclude that by the phrase "that material thing" the Buddha intended any tissue in the body that can function as a basis for consciousness, except those serving as the basis for sensory consciousness. We can understand it as the living nerve cell.  http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/mendis/wheel322.html


I sorta get it.  This refers mostly to simply the physical body that holds, temporarily, consciousness(es).  

He ends out the page noting the Buddha's instruction that the five sense bases each have a distinct field that is totally separate until the mind becomes involved, which experiences all of them.

Lots to consider.  I want to see the door, the object striking it, and the consciousness arising.

Sunday, July 7, 2013

Glass Camels




on the bottom of page six and into PAGE SEVEN
Sayadaw begins to explain the character and relationship of materiality-mentality.  He quotes from the Loka Sutta, just a quote about the EYE sense-door (The Buddha goes on to state the same about the ear, nose, tongue, body and mind): http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn12/sn12.044.than.html

http://epod.usra.edu/.a/6a0105371bb32c970b0120a90385f7970b-750wiThe Blessed One said: "And what is the origination of the world? Dependent on the eye & forms there arises eye-consciousness. The meeting of the three is contact. From contact as a requisite condition comes feeling. From feeling as a requisite condition comes craving. From craving as a requisite condition comes clinging/sustenance. From clinging/sustenance as a requisite condition comes becoming. From becoming as a requisite condition comes birth. From birth as a requisite condition, then aging & death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, distress, & despair come into play. This is the origination of the world.


So what have we got so far?  We have an EYE, a COLOR, and consciousness arising from it.  Anyone else suppose that there was a pre-existent consciousness waiting there? Uh oh, there wasn't. 
So is everything a mirage?  No..... but it is by the time it gets to the mind.

Saturday, July 6, 2013

'Taint Natural

after describing the five aggregates of clinging, Sayadaw references the Khanda Sutta and explains that there are 11 types of clinging:

  1. past
  2. future
  3. present
  4. internal
  5. external
  6. gross
  7. subtle
  8. inferior 
  9. superior
  10. far
  11. near
and these 11 types apply to: 

  1. materiality
  2. feeling
  3. perception
  4. mental formation
  5. consciousness
ending the selection with the Buddha's words, "(whatever kind....) that is tainted, that can be clung to, is called the (1-5 above) aggregate of clinging. "

And while i don't want to just cut and paste, here's some more on the word 'taint'

"And what are the taints, what is the origin of the taints, what is the cessation of the taints, what is the way leading to the cessation of the taints? There are three taints: the taint of sensual desire, the taint of being and the taint of ignorance. With the arising of ignorance there is the arising of the taints. With the cessation of ignorance there is the cessation of the taints. The way leading to the cessation of the taints is just this Noble Eightfold Path; that is, right view... right concentration."
— MN 9 (Ñanamoli/Bodhi, trans.)


Sayadaw ends PAGE 6

reinforcing the fact that there is materiality and mentality, and also drops the bomb on us that 'in the world of the five aggregates, mentality depends on materiality.'

Friday, July 5, 2013

Glasses

PAGE FIVE
Here is a brief conclusion of the Buddha's explanation of reality AS the five Skandhas from the Puppha Sutta (which I cannot find on Access to Insight) but it is somewhere near the Channa Sutta,
which includes the title of this entire booklet, "When it is thus explained, taught, disclosed, analyzed and elucidated by the Tathagata, if there is someone who does not know and see, how can I do anything with that foolish common person, blind and sightless, who does not know and see?"

Not knowing, not seeing.
The first insight I really tried to digest, although it did not come from a religious text or person, was that the self is jealous and hides its true nature to itself.  Now I know that there can be arguments as to the nature of self, and as time goes by I am less comfortable getting away from my constructs, but there is that construct, which has a great deal of subtle power.  The lenses with which we think we see the world are themselves a compound mess.

Sayadaw goes on to reference the Sattipattana Sutta, wherein the Buddha explains (or starts to)  how the aggregates are suffering; "The materiality aggregate of clinging; the feeling aggregate of clinging," etc.



We don't see things as the separate parts they are.  We don't see the how and why we have pasted the world to our senses.  So how can we take them back off and see beyond?


Thursday, July 4, 2013

Independence Day

Sayadaw says on PAGE FOUR
that the Buddha taught the First Noble Truth as the aggregates of
  1. Materiality
  2. Feeling
  3. Perception
  4. Mental Formations
  5. Consciousness
I know theoretically that these five things are all there is.  Most of the universe is made up of materiality, at least it appears to be.  Beings are made of materiality and the other four.  I do experience all of them, and the last four as having a more ephemeral cast, something less solid.  Therefore, the aggregates can also be placed into two groups, materiality and mentality.   I see, from time to time, how I place a mental construct like 'mine' upon material things, including my own body.  When I am happy with things  like my car, my yard, my legs, my wife, I hardly recognize my subtle attachments. When I lose a family member or my own health, the difference between the illusion and reality of my relationship to them is stark and painful.

Sayadaw also quotes the Dhammacakkappavattana sutta which emphasizes impermanence in the suffering of birth, aging, illness, death and 'being united with the unpleasant' and 'being separated from the pleasant'.

Our founding fathers were trying.  Thirteen aggregates were supposed to understand at once their separate and unique natures and have insight into the whole. It sounds fair, but who manages the whole thing? Who manages me? 

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

Supramundanish

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjtg_4fvCuTDYJbTwiBZYDJbZwBzQno4pYb020qa_g7jnzm303rjItcgBK8ET4FdpHH9-Hb6TWQ548_1pV9n7MGP2IK_1FoOIrptRqXQ-Ewm6KIQfvlpYKUTqUMK9jCmFiF758wa-jWdVWH/s800/Cheese+Danish+500.jpg

PAGE THREE

Sayadaw puts an exclamation point on the importance of the four noble truths and adds them in proper cooking order.  We must know the first, second and third Truths before knowing the fourth.  However, to make it very special, we must divides the fourth Truth into two sets of ingredients, the mundane and the supramundane.  Only when the mundane has been fully mixed can the supramundane be added to call it done.

In fact, he suggests we start with the Noble Eightfold Path (the fourth Truth) in this way,
  1. Practice morality (the five or eight precepts; to abstain from harming living beings, stealing, sexual misconduct, lying and intoxication.)
  2. Then practice concentration and develop access concentration and absorption (jhana), 
  3. Then wisdom, which he defines as the realization of the three marks of impermanence, suffering and non-self. 
He briefly mentions the supramundane Path Truth, which (I looked it up although I would guess it will be referenced later), and just how supramundane does it get, well... really a lot;

From Gunaratna's The Jhanas on Access to Insight: http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/gunaratana/wheel351.html#ch5.3

The climax in the development of insight is the attainment of the supramundane paths and fruits. ..The first path, called the path of stream-entry (sotapatti) because it marks the entry into the stream of the Dhamma, eradicates the first three fetters — The false view of self, doubt, and clinging to rites and rituals.

The next supramundane path is that of the once-returner (sakadagami). This path does not eradicate any fetters completely, but it greatly attenuates sensual desire and ill will. The once-returner is so called because he is bound to make an end of suffering after returning to this world only one more time. 

The third path, that of the non-returner (anagami) utterly destroys the sensual desire and ill will weakened by the preceding path.

The highest path, the path of arahatship, eradicate the remaining five fetters — desire for existence in the fine-material and immaterial spheres, conceit, restlessness and ignorance. The arahant has completed the development of the entire path taught by the Buddha. 

And there is so much more... but I must read only a page at time, as I breathe, a little teaspoon of awareness with each breath.


Tuesday, July 2, 2013

A Roof Without Pillars


PAGE TWO

Page two completes the reference to the 'Dispensation' of penetrating the Noble Truths with the phrase Craving for existence has been cut off; the tendency to existence has been destroyed.  I find this aspect, non-returning to existence, the end of fabrication, nibbana, the pure abodes, to be quite odd.  I've always taken it with a grain of doubt, but with enough faith to consider my lack of perspective which binds me to the idea of an eternal soul. 

Page two continues with 'What needs to be fully realized', mainly, the four noble truths (in this case pillars) before one can put an end to suffering (in this case the roof).   How often it is the case that I am restless and arrogant and pout and whine for a special effect without laying down any cause.  I have found (or should I say I have been found) that insight comes about through the conditions of effort, all by itself. 

I look(ed) forward to the Buddha's support and wise prescriptions in the upcoming pages to lay firmly the pillars of the Truths of suffering, its origin, its cessation, and the path.

Monday, July 1, 2013

Prior To

There are a foreword and two editorial notes at the beginning of the book, pages xix to xxvi. In the foreword, a Taiwanese monk mentions the three trainings of morality, concentration and wisdom as fundamental to Buddhist practice, and that they are found in the Vissudhimagga http://www.accesstoinsight.org/lib/authors/nanamoli/PathofPurification2011.pdf, written by Buddhagosa around 430 CE.   He mentions that Pa-Auk Sayadaw's teachings are based on the Vissudhimagga's instructions on attaining the stages of purification and insight-knowledges.

The editorial notes reflect on the imperfections of translation and make mention of Pa-Auk Sayadaw's approach as: "to practise tranquility meditation first, after which to use it as a vehicle for insight meditation."

This is a kind of corrolary to the experience of the Buddha, surrounded by masters of concentration upon this or that, or upon nothingness, he was not satisfied until suffering had been expunged.

PAGE ONE:  Here is an addition to the original edition of Knowing and Seeing, from the Pathamakotigama Sutta, called The Buddha's Dispensation.  In this section, the Buddha addresses the Vaijans saying ". . . because of not understanding and not penetrating the Four Noble Truths. . . you and I have for a long time wandered the round of rebirth.", and then goes on to each specific Truth in the same way, ending on the beginning of page two with the assertion that now they have been understood and penetrated.  

I looked up the word 'pativedha' (penetrating) and it translates as;
'penetration',
signifies the realization of the truth of the Dhamma, as distinguished from the mere acquisition of its wording (pariyatti), or the practice (patipatti) of it, in other words, realization as distinguished from theory and practice. Cf. pariyatti.  http://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/pativedha/index.html 

I think of those things that penetrate, and as the Buddha says in the Dhammapadda,  The scent of Dharma even flies against the wind.   What do we see suffering with?  A trained eye, or heart, or mind can see it for what it is.